Now the part that should change how you treat all of this.
Doing work to a listed building without the consent it needed is a criminal offence. Not a fine you write off as a cost of the job. A crime. And it is what the law calls strict liability, which means you can be found guilty even if you did not know the building was listed. "I did not realise" is not a defence.
The penalty is often quoted wrong. The figure you will still see in older guidance, a £20,000 maximum fine, is out of date. That cap was removed on 12 March 2015. The fine is now unlimited, and for the most serious cases the court can add up to two years in prison.
The fine is not the worst part. Unlike a normal planning breach, there is no time limit on this. With most planning problems, once enough years pass, the council can no longer act. With a listed building, that clock never starts. The exposure does not expire, and it does not stay with the person who did the work. It attaches to the building. Buy a listed house where a previous owner replaced the windows without consent, and you inherit the problem.
That problem usually surfaces at the worst moment, when you sell. The buyer's solicitor asks for the consents. If they are missing, the sale stalls while everyone works out whether to apply for consent late, insure the risk, or drop the price. Work done quietly years ago becomes a live issue at the exact point you want a clean sale.
And here is the honest limit. Nobody can tell you in advance, for certain, which side of the line your window lands on. Not the council, not a heritage consultant, not Myrmex. The judgement only exists once someone qualified has looked at the specific job.
Which means the question you started with had the wrong shape: a Grade II listing was never a list of changes you are banned from making, it is a duty to keep the building's character, judged job by job by a person.
So the safe move is to settle the question before the work starts, not after. That means a heritage statement, setting out what the building is and how the work would affect it. For the borderline jobs, it means a Certificate of Lawfulness, a formal letter from the council confirming a job needs no consent. Every consent is agreed before anyone lifts a tool. That is why Myrmex puts the consent question into the pre-construction stage, before the first wall is opened.